Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Journal of Human Resource Strengthening is journal electronics that have through a peer-review process. Statement This explain behavior ethical all parties involved​ in the process of publication article in journal this , including writer , leader Editorial , Editorial Board , peer- reviewer , and publisher (HRS Development) Statement This based on the Guidelines Practice Best of COPE for Journal Editors .

Publication Ethics Guidelines Journal

Publication articles that have been through a peer-review process in the Journal of Human Resource Strengthening is part important in development network coherent and respected knowledge . This is is reflection direct from quality work authors and the institutions that support them . Articles that have been through a peer-review process to support and realize method scientific . Therefore that 's important For agree standard behavior expected ethics​ for all parties involved​ in action publishing : authors , journal editors , peer reviewers, publishers , and the public .

HRS Development as The publisher of the Journal of Human Resource Strengthening runs his job as supervisor all stages publishing very seriously and we realize not quite enough answer ethics and responsibility answer others . We are committed For ensure that advertising , print repeat , or income commercial other No impact or influence decision editorial . In addition , HRS Development and the Editorial Board will help in communication with journal and/ or other publishers if matter This useful and necessary .

Publication decisions

The Editor of the Journal Human Resource Strengthening is responsible answer For decide which articles are submitted to journal that will published . Validation the work in question and its importance work the for researchers and readers must always become booster decision The editors can guided by editorial board policies journal and is limited by the requirements applicable law​ related pollution Name well , violation right copyright , and plagiarism . Editors can negotiate with the editor or other reviewers in make decision This .

Fair play​

An editor at times evaluate script based on content his intellectual without look at race , type gender , orientation sexual , religious beliefs , origin ethnicity , nationality , or philosophy political writer .

Confidentiality

Editor and all editorial staff no may disclose information anything about​ submitted manuscript​ to anyone but​ the author concerned , reviewers , candidates reviewers , other editorial advisors , and publishers , as should be .

Disclosure and conflict interest

Material that is not published which is disclosed in submitted manuscript​ No may used in editor's own research without agreement written from writer .

Task Reviewer

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Review peer assist the editor in make editorial decisions , and editorial communications with the author can also help writer in increase paper .

Speed

Every reviewer chosen one who feels No fulfil condition For review reported research​ in A script or know that review fast No Possible done must give know the editor and resign self from the review process .

Confidentiality

Every accepted manuscript​ For reviewed must treated as document secret . Manuscript the No may shown or discussed with other people except If permitted by the editor.

Standard Objectivity

Review must done in a way objective . Personal criticism to writer No appropriate . The assessors must state view they with clear accompanied by supporting arguments .​

Confession Source

The reviewers must identify work publication relevant yet​ quoted by the author . Every statement that a observation , derivation , or argument has reported previously must accompanied by with relevant quotes .​ A reviewers must also give know the editor about existence similarity substantial or overlap overlap between the script in progress considered and every paper other publications they know in a way personal .

Disclosure and Conflict Interest

Information or special ideas obtained​ through peer review must guarded its confidentiality and not used For profit personal . The reviewers are not may consider manuscript containing​ conflict interests that arise from connection or connection competitive , collaborative , or connection other with author , company , or any related institution with paper the .

Task Writer

Standard reporting

Writer report study original must serve report accurate about work done​ as well as discussion objective about its significance . Basic data must served in a way accurate in paper . A paper must contains sufficient details and references For allows others to imitate work said . The statement is deceptive or No accurate in a way on purpose is inappropriate behavior​ ethical and unethical can accepted .

Data Access and Retention

Writer requested For provide related raw data​ with A paper For editorial review , and must Ready For provide access public against the data ( according to with ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if allows , and in condition whatever must be Ready For save the data For term reasonable time​ after publication .

Originality and Plagiarism

Writer must ensure that they has write a completely finished work original , and if writer has use the work and/ or words of others, things the has quoted or listed in the right place .

Publication Multiple , Excessive or Simultaneously

In general general , a writer No may publish a script that is basically to describe the same research in more from One journal or publication main . Sending the same script to more from One journal in a way simultaneously is behavior publication that is not ethical and unethical can accepted .

Confession Source

Proper recognition​ on other people's work must be always given . Author must to quote influential publications​ in determine characteristic reported work .​

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship must limited to those who have give contribution significant to conception , design , implementation , or interpretation from reported research . All that has been give contribution significant must listed as colleague author . If there is someone else who has participate in aspect substantive certain from project research , they must acknowledged or listed as contributor . Author correspondence must ensure that all colleague appropriate and inappropriate authors​ There is colleague the author who does not in accordance included in the paper , and that all colleague writer has see and agree final version of the paper and has been agree his submission For published .

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the job involving material chemistry , procedure or equipment that has danger No commonplace inherent in its use , author must identify matter the with clear in script .

Disclosure and Conflict Interest

All writer must disclose in script they every conflict interest financial or substantive others that can interpreted influence results or interpretation script all of them source support financial For project the must expressed .

Error fundamental in published works​

If a writer find error or significant inaccuracies in the published work , then​ become obligation writer For quick tell him to the journal editor or publisher and work The same with editor for interesting return or repair paper the .